Casêra: fresh comfort-food delivery

Period: April to May 2024 | 40 days from zero to pitch

Team: 4 people. Evaldo and I (Product) · Paula and Josué (Marketing)

Problem

Workers value healthy food, but don't practice it.

The intention-behavior gap showed up in every interview. No service on the market combined freshness, personalization, convenience, and warmth.

My role

End-to-end design in 40 days, from discovery to pitch.

I worked on quantitative and qualitative research, insight synthesis, the pivot, information architecture, the MVP interface, and the pitch deck.

Outcome

The project closed at the pitch stage, with no production metrics.
What the research validated:

  • The problem is real and recurring: the intention-behavior gap appeared in all 11 interviews.

  • No competitor sits at the intersection of the 4 axes: freshness, warmth, personalization, and convenience. Validated by market benchmark.

  • 10/10 score from the MBA panel.

01 - Context

The idea came out of an innovation program with a fixed pitch deadline

Starting question:

How might we create a healthy eating solution for workers with hectic routines?

02 - Discovery

CSD Framework

Before going into the field, we mapped what we needed to know

Certainties

Suppositions

Doubts

Cooking during lunch breaks takes significant time

Price is the main barrier

What do they consider ideal food?

People eat processed food for convenience

Fitness-oriented people would use a recipe helper

What does their routine look like?

There's a disconnect between production chain and end consumer

Raw food is automatically perceived as healthy

Is it lack of time or lack of habit?

  • Certainties

    Cooking during lunch breaks takes significant time

    Suppositions

    Price is the main barrier

    Doubts

    What do they consider ideal food?

  • Certainties

    People eat processed food for convenience

    Suppositions

    Fitness-oriented people would use a recipe helper

    Doubts

    What does their routine look like?

  • Certainties

    There's a disconnect between production chain and end consumer

    Suppositions

    Raw food is automatically perceived as healthy

    Doubts

    Is it lack of time or lack of habit?

Quantitative research

Goal: identify patterns that justified going deeper qualitatively.

32 respondents. Urban young adults, 22 to 36, office workers, with declared concern about their eating habits.

3 patterns:

  • Intention-behavior gap around healthy eating.

  • Price stacks alongside quality and variety as the most valued attributes.

  • Most don't use any service or app for healthy eating.

Qualitative research

Scripts structured by complexity: routine, definition of healthy food, challenges, enablers, and imagined solutions.

11 interviews produced 3 clusters:

Zens

Balance between body and mind. They hold an emotional view of food.

The Strict Ones

Frenetic pace, regimented eating, looking for practicality.

Wannabes

Growing interest in healthy eating, but no clear starting point.

The insight that reorganized the project:

Healthy food is mom's cooking.

All the data took on new meaning. Health and warmth occupied the same place in consumer perception.

  • Evidence

    100% associated "healthy" with "fresh" and "natural"

    Decision

    Reject frozen

    Product

    Fresh meal boxes, prepared same day

  • Evidence

    100% associated "healthy" with "fresh" and "natural"

    Decision

    Reject frozen

    Product

    Fresh meal boxes, prepared same day

  • Evidence

    Letícia: "Frozen food tastes like plastic"

    Decision

    Differentiate from LivUp

    Product

    Freshness as brand criterion

  • Evidence

    Natalia: "Having to think about prep is friction"

    Decision

    Remove logistics from the user

    Product

    Weekly subscription with delivery

  • Evidence

    Natan: "Frozen meals fall short on protein and carbs"

    Decision

    Personalize portions

    Product

    Individual nutritional recommendation

03 - Evidence-based decisions

Evidence

Decision

Product

Rafael: "Mom's cooking, care is the main thing"

Position around comfort food

Home cooks with names and faces (grandmas)

100% associated "healthy" with "fresh" and "natural"

Reject frozen

Fresh meal boxes, prepared same day

Letícia: "Frozen food tastes like plastic"

Differentiate from LivUp

Freshness as brand criterion

Natalia: "Having to think about prep is friction"

Remove logistics from the user

Weekly subscription with delivery

Natan: "Frozen meals fall short on protein and carbs"

Personalize portions

Individual nutritional recommendation

04 - Value proposition

No player on the market combines the 4 axes.

Casêra: weekly delivery (fast) · prepared same day (fresh) · home cooks with names and faces (warmth) · menu with nutritional guidance (personalized).

05 - Pivot

Home cooks preparing meal boxes in their own homes raised constraints that put the idea's viability in doubt:

  • Sanitary regulation: hard to guarantee hygiene standards in domestic kitchens.

  • Nutritional standardization: precise macro grammage is incompatible with artisanal prep without training.

  • Scale: high demand would break individual production capacity.

  • Public perception: outsourcing production to elderly women in a gig model raised reputational risk.

Warmth was the differentiator. Letting it go meant becoming another generic healthy delivery.

We separated authorship from execution. The cook owns the recipe, is the face of the dish, and earns commission per meal sold. Production is on us.

06 - Architecture & flows

MVP

Minimum cycle: signup → nutritional onboarding → plan → cook → first order

The extended flow is justified by the model itself: a personalized menu depends on the nutritional profile. Not tested with users.

07 - Conclusions

Lessons

The double diamond won't always come out round

The goal should be the most complete process possible, while understanding that constraints and changes are part of any real project.

We confirmed the problem, not the product

We know the intention-behavior gap exists. We didn't test whether people would pay, whether cooks would sign up, or whether the onboarding causes drop-off.

Small samples demand honesty

32 respondents is not a statistical sample. 11 interviewees is not theoretical saturation.

What I'd do differently

Interview real cooks before defining the model.

Test the onboarding with 3 to 5 people on a prototype. One day of prep, one day of testing.

Next steps

Fake door test: landing page with plans and a pre-signup CTA to measure demand before investing in operations.

Research with cooks: interviewing real cooks would give a real read on the product's reception and the viability of the value proposition.

Usability test: measure drop-off in the extended onboarding.